David Murray and Jephthah’s Vow. Part 1
David Murray recently posted a
discussion of Jephthah’s vow (Judges 11:29-40). Reading Murray’s post, one
might be forgiven for wondering why anyone would ever have thought that
Jephthah made a burnt offering out of his daughter. However, a closer look at
Murray’s points, reveals that none of them is certain. In the following, I give
Murray’s points, each followed by a brief critique. I'll deal with the last two points and give a final evaluation in the second post.
Jephthah knew the Bible, so he would have known that human sacrifice was
prohibited. The proof offered here is Jephthah’s response to the king of Ammon
in vss 12-27. But that doesn’t prove that Jephthah knew his Bible. It just
proves he knew his history. They aren’t the same thing.
He was filled with the Holy Spirit. So? That doesn’t prove anything
either. One of the odd things about men in the Old Testament is that they are
filled with the Spirit of the Lord for executing particular tasks. See, for
example, Samson killing a lion in the power of the Spirit (Judges 14:5-6), or
the Spirit of the Lord coming upon Saul (1 Samuel 10:6-10). Neither of those
episodes shows that the men were filled with the Holy Spirit in a New Testament
sense of the word.
Alternative translation of vs 31, using “or” rather than “and.” Yes, that
is a possible alternate translation. So is the translation: “it shall be the
Lord’s: that is, I will offer it up as a burnt offering.” The existence of an
alternative translation does not prove which translation is correct.
Common custom of women serving at the tent of the Lord (Exodus 38:8).
That there were such women serving at the tent of the Lord in the wilderness is
clear. They are also mentioned in 1 Samuel 2:22. However, it is not clear that
they were virgins, which is essential to Murray’s conclusion. There’s no
evidence to that effect either in Exodus or in 1 Samuel.
The consequences not being her death, but her being husbandless and
childless. That is certainly possible, but it would strengthened if there was
some indication that dedication to the Lord’s service required perpetual
virginity. There is no such indication anywhere in the Old Testament.
Furthermore, if she were killed, she would certainly die without husband or
child.
Commemorate, not lament. In Murray’s view, the NASB is correct in vs 40
in saying, “the daughters of Israel went yearly to commemorate the daughter of
Jephthah.” He then says, they were going with “worshipful joy.” That goes well
beyond what the word might possibly say. The word occurs only twice in the Old Testament:
Judges 5:11 and Judges 11:40. First, these are two very different contexts, so
what the word might mean in 5:11 is not necessarily what it means here.
Further, the ancient versions read “lament” here, which might be wrong, but it
certainly is what the translators understood the word to say. The word may mean
no more than to recount or retell.
Possibility of repentance. Certainly Jephthah could have repented of a
foolish vow. But the text seems to indicate either that he did not think it was
foolish, or that he could repent of it (see verse 35).
1 comment:
Would you comment on the fact that his name is used as a hero of the faith in Hebrews 11? thanks
Post a Comment