This post has some suggestions: http://www.theologyinworship.com/2015/01/07/12-solutions-for-a-church-that-just-wont-sing/
While I appreciate what he says, I think he’s simply wrong
on some points, so I’ll take it point by point.
First point: Yes. Absolutely right. Couldn’t agree more.
Second point: No Absolutely wrong. Couldn’t disagree more.
He no doubt knows more about the use of the organ in the Reformation and
post-Reformation periods than I do. But I grew up in a church with an organ. I
worshiped more recently for more than twenty years in a church with an organ.
My conclusion is that unless the organist is very careful the organ overwhelms
singing. As a result, rather than screaming the songs, in order to hear themselves
over the sound of the organ, most people just don’t sing. A piano is a much better
accompanying instrument. Organ vs. guitar is simply a false dichotomy.
Third, fourth, and fifth points: He fails to realize that
three is a contradiction of four. What is a choir if not a performing group?
And the voices of the choir will do much more to help the congregational
singing if they are actually scattered throughout the congregation, rather than
being collected in one place up front. Otherwise I agree with the fourth point,
as well as getting rid of the lead singer, which is just a one-man choir
performing up front.
Sixth and seventh points: Not only is the singing in church
too much, it is often unsingable by the ordinary person, because it was written
for a soloist. This also relates to the thirteenth point. The singing outside
of church is usually too little because people don’t know tunes. While I’m not
an advocate of exclusive psalmody, one of the strengths of the old Scottish
Psalter was that you could sing through the entire psalter even if you only
knew a handful of tunes.
Points eight and nine: I’m in general agreement here. Though
for many churches, the choice of space is limited by resources and availability.
If a church is in a position to build its own building, acoustics is certainly
one factor to take into account.
Points ten to twelve: Again, general agreement here. I read
music, so I find myself frustrated by lyrics on the big screen. I enjoy
learning new tunes, but I do better learning them if I have music to read. I
have also found that many of the newer songs are “unpredictable” from a musical
standpoint: that is, they go up when you expect them to go down, or some such.
Finally, the point being made is to ask ourselves the
question, “Is there enough substance to what we sing that it is worthwhile to
put out the effort to actually learn it and to sing it?”
No comments:
Post a Comment