Someone in a Facebook group posted last week that their
pastor had his eighteen-year-old son preach for the congregation, and they
asked whether that was right or not. It provoked quite a bit of discussion. I
realize that some ecclesiastical traditions try to get young men into the
pulpit as soon as possible, arguing that they need experience in the pulpit if
they are going to be effective preachers. I think it’s a bad idea, for several
reasons.
First, young men put in positions of authority tend to
become living, breathing examples of “knowledge puffs up.” Second, unless a man
has some physical limitation, almost anyone can be taught to speak effectively
in public. Certainly, preachers need practice, but I’m not sure it helps the
congregation to put teenagers in the pulpit. Practice can be provided in other
ways and in other contexts. Third, I’m sure that most young men do not meet the
qualifications for elder set out in 1 Timothy and Titus.
What do I look for in a young man who thinks that he might
be called to the ministry? First, the qualifications set out in the Pastoral
Epistles. But in addition to those, I think four other qualifications are
necessary. First, does the young man have a servant’s heart? I read often about
teenagers doing community service to pad their applications for college. But,
does this young man look for opportunities to serve? Does he serve when no one
is watching? Does he work as hard at service when he is not being watched as
when he is? The work of the pastor is a work of service. Someone without a
servant’s heart may preach well, but he will never be a pastor.
Second, is he teachable? It is unfortunately the case that
many young men, especially in Reformed circles, go through “cage-stage” Calvinism,
in which they think themselves to be the one appointed to cure all the ills of
the church. But young men need to learn. They need to learn that a good grasp
of the Five Points is not enough. They need to learn that others, particularly
older folks, often know more than the young man does, due to life experience
and faithful participation in the life of the church. Is the young man willing
to be corrected? It he receptive to the sometime painful rebuke?
Third, is he faithful? I have occasionally heard younger
people referred t as “possibility junkies.” That is, they won’t commit to
anything because something better might come along. Or, having committed to
something, will renege on it because something better has come along. So, is
this young man faithful, making commitments and staying with them even if
“something better” comes along? Is he a regular and faithful participant in the
life of the church? Is he in attendance week in and week out, or is he
frequently absent?
Fourth, is he patient? Often, young men are in a hurry to
get into the pulpit. He has a real zeal for Christ. He has a true desire to
proclaim the gospel. This combination of zeal and desire tends to produce an
urgency on his part to enter the work of the ministry. But God is rarely in a
hurry. In fact, God often puts a man in the wilderness for a while before he
puts him in the ministry. Is this young man ready to wait for God’s timing?
God does occasionally call young men into early and evident
pulpit ministry. Jonathan Edwards and Charles Spurgeon are often cited as
examples. But these men are the exception, not the rule. Is a young man willing
to be part of the rule, rather than the exception? Then, if he is also a
teachable, patient, faithful servant, maybe he is ready to begin training for
the ministry.
No comments:
Post a Comment