Most pastors realize in seminary that they have gotten
themselves into a profession that requires reading. Whether they read much
before seminary, the class requirements force them to read a great deal. This
is especially true for Presbyterian and Reformed pastors, as these churches
have always put a high value on an educated clergy. By the time they finish
seminary, they have gotten used to reading demanding material—academic biblical
studies, systematic theology, church history. It is easy, then, to forget that
at one time they really struggled with that material.
I have been a voracious reader since I learned to read. But
until I got to college, I didn’t read anything that made any demands on me as a
reader. Then my first class in college was a philosophy class. I passed the
class, but I’m pretty sure I understood no more than about ten percent of what
I read for that class. After I was converted, I read the Bible a lot, but I
didn’t read a great deal of Christian literature. I did read Watchman Nee’s The
Normal Christian Life and Sit, Walk, Stand (both perfectionist
standards back in the day), but I remember almost nothing else of what Christian
literature I read. I read C. S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity, which seemed
to me to be heavy reading. I also read another work by Lewis, either the
Problem of Pain or Miracles, I’m not sure which. I think I finished
the book but found it a very difficult slog. Then I read his Pilgrim’s Regress,
which I didn’t understand at all.
After seminary, I have gone back and revisited some of those
books and didn’t find them difficult. But by then, I had read enough difficult
theology that I had the context and the foundational understanding to read
Lewis with ease. I think something like this happens with most pastors. They have
gotten used to reading difficult material, so they tend to think that everyone
ought to be able to read it.
I may be entirely wrong about this, but I think most people
who can read don’t read. And most people who read don’t read anything that
makes demands on them as a reader. They read what is comfortable for them.
Pastors need to keep this in mind when they recommend books for people in their
congregations. The fact that a given book is not difficult for you does not
mean that it won’t be difficult for them. There’s a reason that most of the
books on sale in a Christian bookstore are theologically substandard. They are
written by people who have a substandard theological training, but they are
also written for people who don’t know much theology. These authors may have
bad theology, but they know their audience and they write to their audience
.
It’s something to keep in mind when recommending books for
people in your congregation. Ask yourself if the person will not only willingly
read the book but also understand it. If you have visited the person’s home,
you should have a good idea of what they read (or whether they read). You
should also keep a list of less demanding, more accessible, sound Christian
books. Avoid recommending the fat books with small print, unless you know that
is what the person reads. Avoid reprints of the Puritans. There’s nothing wrong
with the Puritans—a lot of good stuff there. But most modern Americans would
not be able to work through Puritan works without a lot of help. The Banner of Truth Puritan Paperbacks are about the most accessible Puritan works available. As a pastor,
you are a shepherd. You want to feed your sheep good food, but it had better be
food that they’re willing and able to eat.
2 comments:
"Ask yourself if the person will not only willingly read the book but also understand it. If you have visited the person’s home, you should have a good idea of what they read (or whether they read). You should also keep a list of less demanding, more accessible, sound Christian books. Avoid recommending the fat books with small print, unless you know that is what the person reads. Avoid reprints of the Puritans. There’s nothing wrong with the Puritans—a lot of good stuff there. But most modern Americans would not be able to work through Puritan works without a lot of help."
This will only fulfill the aphorism "Set low expectations and you'll get low performance." What about the idea of challenging the flock to grow? Seems to be non-existent here, and in fact, your recommendation runs the almost definite risk of creating a self-imposed echo chamber.
I like how "Anonymous" takes me to task. Anonymous needs to go back and re-read the post. I say that we should encourage people to read, but that we should begin where they are, not with where we think they ought to end up. We don't teach our children to read by giving them Dickens in the second grade, but we work with them to get them to the place where they will willingly read Dickens. With theology, for people who don't read much, we begin with theological works that are accessible, gradually moving them up to more substantial works.
Post a Comment